Press Releases

Salceda on proposed DSWD food stamp program: Help farmers, provide “special food stamps” for agri surplus; Econ managers should consider earmarking junk food taxes for nutrition programs

June 5th, 2023

House Ways and Means Chair Joey Sarte Salceda (Albay, 2nd district) is urging the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) to integrate its proposed food stamps program with the efforts of the Department of Agriculture (DA) to purchase and market domestic farm produce, emphasizing that “the poorest communities remain the rural poor of this country.”

“Food stamps, as envisioned and implemented in other countries, are really agricultural programs. They aim to bridge rural surpluses with food-poor urban communities. That way, we address both urban poverty and rural poverty,” Salceda said.

“Around 30 percent of farmers are poor. So, if you want to make this program sustainable, you link it with boosting farmer incomes,” Salceda added.

Salceda is commenting on the food stamp program proposed by the DSWD, which has so far met some opposition from economic managers due to costs.

“As it was originally implemented in the US, where the food stamp program is most prevalent and arguably most successful, you can have a specific amount for general food items, and you can have a special stamp or voucher for surplus produce.”

“What the farmers can get for surplus produce are food stamps for the general program. So, you help solve their food insecurity issues. You take out the surplus, helping manage prices. And you provide free surplus food to those who need it. It’s a great synergy,” Salceda added.

“So, I think the DSWD should really team up with the DA on this program,” Salceda added.

Consider earmarking sweetened beverage taxes, new taxes on junk food

The House tax chair also said that the government should consider using revenues from the sweetened beverage tax to fund the food stamp program.

“The TRAIN law, which introduced sweetened beverage taxes, earmarks around 30 percent of its revenues to social measures, including, very specifically, “Social mitigating measures and investments in: (i) education, (ii) health, targeted nutrition, and anti-hunger programs for mothers, infants, and young children.””

“We were also not able to earmark programs for sugar farmers under the law. And we should have. That was part of the deal. So, I strongly suggest that if we are going to do this, let’s pilot it for poor sugar farmers,” Salceda added.

“If you will earmark the revenues entirely for this program, I think junk food taxes also stand a chance in Congress. So, it has to be a DOH-DA-DSWD effort, with the economic managers guiding us about funding,” Salceda added.

Earlier, the economic managers called for the passage of increases in the sweetened beverage taxes.

“If we are going to discuss new taxes on any junk food, funding nutritional programs should be part of the mix. I have not received an official request from the Department of Finance to take up the measure they said they want my committee to take up. But if they send a draft bill for me to file and take up, funding nutritional programs with a hard earmark has to be part of the mix,” Salceda concluded.

Other Press Releases
Statement on the pronouncements against the Public Service Act amendments (RA 11659)
Read More
Statement on the February 2024 jobs report
Read More
Statement on the March 2024 inflation figures
Read More
The problem of access to Senior Citizen healthcare is structural, but it should be addressed alongside other issues with Senior Citizen welfare.
Read More